Myth:\u00a0 Bullishness tied with extended low volatility leads to market collapse<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Sentiment can be measured in many ways. This discussion will cover only a few sentiment measures for the stock and bond market.\u00a0 Major categories citing investor sentiment include surveys, volatility, and spreads.<\/p>\n
Market Vane is an organization that surveys investors, tracking if the respondents are bullish or bearish toward specific stock market indexes and other investment choices. Readings at 50 convey a 50% response of bullishness and thus a neutral reading.\u00a0 Levels above 70% bullishness have not been seen since 2007, so above 60% is a modern interpretation of extreme bullishness.\u00a0 Notice how the Market Vane readings above 60 appeared to have stopped the S&P 500 Total Return Index in its tracks back in November and December 2015 and again as recently as April of this year.\u00a0 The evidence presented in this chart supports the idea that extremes in bullishness mark highs in the stock market.<\/p>\n Now let\u2019s go back to late 2014 and the summer of 2015. Points 1 and 2, respectively, display sharp market corrections.\u00a0 Did the correction occur following extreme bullish readings from the Market Vane S&P 500 Index survey?\u00a0 Absolutely!\u00a0 As mentioned earlier, myths are often founded in some element of fact and that was the case for these two examples.\u00a0 However, like the boy who cried wolf, extreme investor bullishness was visible for many months prior to the corrections as the S&P 500 worked higher.\u00a0 This is just one example but the claim of extreme bullishness warning of an impending market correction may have a nugget of truth, but care needs to be given when embracing the message as immediately useful.\u00a0 If the Market Vane reading reaches over 60 in the future, odds favor that we will once again hear the myth of a market correction being at our doorstep.<\/p>\n Another popular measure of investor sentiment is the CBOE Volatility Index, commonly referred to as the \u201cVIX\u201d \u2013 most data vendors have the letters V-I-X within their version of the symbol. Generally speaking, the VIX conveys the implied volatility component embedded with S&P 500 Index options.\u00a0 While the VIX is by far the most popular, this measure exists for numerous indexes and investment choices.\u00a0 Investors eager to buy options during periods of increased volatility tend to pay inflated option premiums relative to periods of lower volatility.\u00a0 Think of it like how someone seeking hurricane insurance as a storm approaches would likely pay higher insurance premiums than if no storm was predicted.\u00a0 Therefore, the VIX tends to decline as investors become more bullish and rise as investors become more fearful.\u00a0 This explains why the VIX is also called the \u201cFear Index or Indicator\u201d.<\/p>\n The myth is that a low VIX precedes market corrections.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Remember, the word \u201cmyth\u201d is not being defined as outright false but has a measure of false or exaggerated claims.\u00a0 The chart above supports the myth in multiple periods.\u00a0 The lower portion of the chart displays a horizontal line at the 15 level, what many would claim as a low number historically \u2013 at least according to myth.\u00a0 Sub-15 readings preceded the S&P 500 TR Index corrections in August, 2015, January 2016, and the loss of momentum in April to present May.<\/p>\n Now let\u2019s go back to 2013 through 2014. The VIX not only reached below 15 but stayed under that line for months at a time while the S&P 500 TR Index continued higher.\u00a0 Not shown, but this was also the case during the bull market environment from 2005 through the first half of 2007.<\/p>\n Next stop is a sentiment gauge within the bond market, specifically the high yield market. The yield spread measures yields from treasuries, usually the 10-year T-Bond, versus high yield bonds.\u00a0 Spreads widen when investor fears heighten, sometimes for valid, longer-term reasons and sometimes for short-lived, emotional ones.\u00a0 Ideally, a favorable environment has declining trends in yield spreads which is the case currently.\u00a0 With this example, we will avoid directly noting a widespread myth but some common concerns are to be addressed.\u00a0 In the first half of 2015, yield spreads were falling as the high yield index rose to test the previous highs from mid\/late 2014.\u00a0 The fast rise and perceived resistance would have been reasonable concerns brought up by investors. Those concerns alone, however, would have provided a flimsy argument despite the accuracy evident by the failure of the trend.\u00a0 So far in 2016, the high yield index has accelerated sharply and is now near potential resistance of the previous highs \u2013 a very similar situation to early 2015.\u00a0 Using this level of the yield spread as a gauge of investor bullishness, its current level is not sending the message of over-exuberance.<\/p>\n If we turn our attention to a longer-term chart, the current yield spread in the mid-5\u2019s is not only far from the lowest levels, but lower levels can be maintained for long periods of time while uptrends in the high yield market persist.<\/p>\n Clues brought to our attention by various sources should not be totally disregarded, but myths tend to persist because many are taken at face value as being true.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n In the three examples presented, arguments can be made that warrant attention in the current market environment, based on successful but narrowly focused historical examples.\u00a0 Savvy investors develop habits of investigation and research that often bust long-held Wall Street myths.<\/p>\n Disclosures<\/strong><\/p>\n S&P 500 TR Index:<\/strong> is a capitalization weighted index of 500 stocks representing all major domestic industry groups and assumes the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains. It is not possible to directly invest in any index.<\/p>\n Barclays US High Yield Very Liquid Index:<\/strong> This benchmark includes publicly issued U.S. dollar denominated non-investment grade, fixed-rate taxable corporate bonds that have a remaining maturity of at least one year, regardless of optionality. The bonds are rated high yield (Ba1\/BB+\/BB+ or below) using the middle rating of Moody\u2019s, S&P, and Fitch, respectively (before July 1, 2005, the lower of Moody\u2019s and S&P was used). Included issues consist of only the three largest bonds from each issuer that has a minimum amount outstanding of $500 million or more (face value) and less than five years from issue date.<\/p>\n This writing is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell, a solicitation to buy, or a recommendation regarding any securities transaction, or as an offer to provide advisory or other services by\u00a0Spectrum Financial, Inc.\u00a0in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation, purchase or sale would be unlawful under the securities laws of such jurisdiction. The information contained in this writing should not be construed as financial or investment advice on any subject matter. Spectrum Financial, Inc. expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken based on any or all of the information on this writing. \u00a0For full disclosure please see disclosures page here.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Myths are stories that often have some element of truth in origin, but over time, take on untrue characteristics. Wall Street is no exception as investors often hold tight to methods that appear to be helpful short-cuts to wealth but often fail when viewed from other angles.\u00a0 At the beginning of the year, investors talked […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[41,40],"class_list":["post-840","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-market-research","tag-sell-in-may-and-go-away","tag-wall-street-myth-vs-market-reality"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/investspectrum.com\/uma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/840"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/investspectrum.com\/uma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/investspectrum.com\/uma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/investspectrum.com\/uma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/investspectrum.com\/uma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=840"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/investspectrum.com\/uma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/840\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":856,"href":"https:\/\/investspectrum.com\/uma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/840\/revisions\/856"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/investspectrum.com\/uma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=840"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/investspectrum.com\/uma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=840"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/investspectrum.com\/uma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=840"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"Market](\"http:\/\/investspectrum.com\/uma\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Weekly-Blog-Chart1.png\")
<\/a>Created with TradeStation \u00a9TradeStation Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved<\/span><\/p>\n<\/a>Created with TradeStation \u00a9TradeStation Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved<\/span><\/p>\n<\/a>Created with TradeStation \u00a9TradeStation Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved<\/span><\/p>\n<\/a>Created with TradeStation \u00a9TradeStation Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved<\/span><\/p>\n<\/a>Created with TradeStation \u00a9TradeStation Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved<\/span><\/p>\n<\/a>Created with TradeStation \u00a9TradeStation Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved<\/span><\/p>\n