Tag: Failing to plan

Intro to Indicators – A look behind the curtain

Active portfolio management is not a new concept but tends to be more mysterious to investors regarding what the wizards do behind the curtain. Even if it is not used exclusively, technical analysis tends to play a greater role in active management as compared to fundamental analysis.  Prior blog posts have covered some of the differences between the two.  Today we will be running through a rather quick history lesson about technical analysis including the evolution and role of indicators.  As the tools of the trade are understood, the fog of mystery should begin to disperse.

Technical analysis did not have one specific starting point. The benefits of plotting prices for the sake of extracting clues of future direction occurred in the 1600’s as lottery prices were plotted in England.  Accounts by Joseph de la Vega reported prices in the Dutch markets also in the 1600’s and Homma Munehisa of the rice markets in 17th century Japan.

bank-englandBank of London

In the U.S., Charles H. Dow created his famous index to visualize the collective changes in a group of industrial companies.  In the early 1900’s, traders and authors such as Richard Schabacker, Harold Gartley, William Gann, R.N. Elliot, and Richard Wyckoff developed and published methods to interpret the price action of stocks and commodities.  “Technical Analysis of Stock Trends” by Edwards and Magee, is commonly cited as the most comprehensive book on early technical analysis.  Most of these works center around identification and interpretation of trends, price patterns, and volume analysis.  This was the era in which concepts such as, Head and Shoulders tops and bottoms, double tops and bottoms, triangles, support and resistance, and trend lines were introduced.

Fast forward to the late 1960’s and early 1970’s, which brings us to the early stages of the meat of our topic – indicators. In 1969, Sherman McClellan and his mathematician wife Marian developed the oscillator and summation bearing their last name.  Amazingly, the complex math was calculated daily, originally by hand, prior to the aid of computers.

 One of my life’s greatest thrills was eating lunch at a Taco Bell with Mr. McClellan many years ago, but that’s a story for another time.

In 1978, J. Welles Wilder Jr. published, “New Concepts in Technical Trading Systems”.  Similar to the McClellan indicators, Wilder’s indicators were described to readers exactly how to calculate by hand the formulas behind indicators using daily worksheets.  Wilder’s book introduced indicators such as the Relative Strength Index (RSI), Directional Movement (ADX and DMI), Parabolic SAR, Average True Range (ATR), and others.  These indicators are early examples of going beyond looking at basic price action.  In other words, math formulas were introduced that can create plots on the same page or chart as the price action to serve as a companion to the traditional forms of price and volume analysis.

red-green-candle-pricesExample of early charting software displaying candlesticks

As a brief but important aside, 1970 was the beginning of the Market Technicians Association (MTA). This organization was established by a group of professional technical analysts that sought to raise the level of acceptance of the craft to beyond what had been deemed by many as a “voodoo” form of analysis.  Many of the MTA members are well-known, having extensive authorship and media appearances regarding chart-based methods.  In 1949, the Securities and Exchange Commission displayed a strong bias against chart-based methods when the organization stated “all Wall Street research must be rooted in sound fundamental principles”.  Through ongoing efforts by the MTA, in 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission amended Rule 344.  “There are officially two different categories of Wall Street research analysts: a fundamental analyst follows companies and has a CFA diploma; a technical analyst follows stocks and has a CMT diploma”.

In the decades that followed, computers and technology have played significant roles in the expansion of technical analysis and its impact to portfolio management. Already mentioned were trailblazers such as the McClellans and J. Welles Wilder Jr., but many others developed indicators that received notoriety.  An indicator by Dick Arms was seen scrolling along the tickers on the financial programs noted as the TRIN or Trading Index, though many call the indicator the Arms Index in honor of the originator.  Joe Granville’s On Balance Volume, John Bollinger’s Bollinger Bands, Gerald Appel’s Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD), and many others became staples among chartists as early versions of charting software incorporated these tools.

bloomberg-terminalsIndicators can fit into various categories and similar to a chef reaching for specific ingredients, can be combined and incorporated with different weightings in order for a portfolio to take on a particular flavor or have a particular personality. Low volatility funds may use specific indicators while aggressive portfolios may choose to use others.  In future blogs, we will take a look at these different categories, covering some indicator examples and why a portfolio manager may or may not use them in the recipe.

So why spend time with the history lesson? A building’s foundation must be strong in order for it to stand the tests of time.  Before the building blocks form the foundation, architects, engineers, and contractors must understand the nature of the building materials and how they work together for the common goal.  If we want to understand how a portfolio is constructed and managed, we have to establish a basis upon why portfolio management has confidence in the methods.  From a broader sense, some chart-based analysis used by portfolio managers may be relatively simple but many can be very complex, based on decades of supporting research and development by many wizards of the craft.

Disclosures

This writing is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell, a solicitation to buy, or a recommendation regarding any securities transaction, or as an offer to provide advisory or other services by Spectrum Financial, Inc. in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation, purchase or sale would be unlawful under the securities laws of such jurisdiction. The information contained in this writing should not be construed as financial or investment advice on any subject matter. Spectrum Financial, Inc. expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken based on any or all of the information on this writing.  For full disclosure please see disclosures page here.

Brexit and Active Management

Stock markets around the globe reacted by moving sharply lower on Friday, 6/24/16, and again on Monday, 6/27/16. Chart-based or technical analysis-based investors point out that chart patterns and indicators often give warnings ahead of declines.  In some cases, however, declines can be swift and without warning.  In most cases, these are initiated by news events in which there are very low probabilities of foreknowledge by even a small number of individuals.

Low probability news events can be labeled as “UFOs” or “Unforeseen Fundamental Occurrences”

Terrorist events and natural disasters are the most common “UFOs”. Interest rate changes and currency devaluations can be surprises but in many instances, some clues may be present in price action ahead of the actual event.  In many cases, dates of certain news events are known ahead of time but the outcome may be a shock to market participants.  Examples of this would be scheduled economic releases, including Federal Reserve policy announcements, as well as earnings releases from major companies.   Most recently, the vote for Britain’s possible exit of the European Union was known, but the actual result of the vote obviously was a surprise to market participants.

So how should investors respond to UFOs? Some readers may see it as a blatant omission of valid strategies if not mentioned, but one response is the use of option strategies of varying degrees of sophistication.  In this article, however, we are going to focus on a broader, more practical concept.

News events happen on a daily basis which means we need to define UFO shocks versus other times of weakness. For now, we will limit the discussion to downside shocks but the concepts will generally transfer over to upside surprises.  Chartists or technical analysis-based investors, can define UFO type of shocks in many different ways.  The underlying concept behind technical analysis is that price action, and various market related data, conveys the net stance of market participants – bullish or bearish and the degree of their convictions through buying and selling intensity.  Logically, shocks mostly run counter the prevailing trend. With trend following being so popular for charting reasons or fundamental reasons, a large number of investors can be caught off-guard.  This results in a herd mentality stampede.

A popular technical choice is the use of Bollinger Bands. These display a moving average with upper and lower lines or bands that respond to the volatility of the underlying investment.  Movements outside the bands by the underlying investment, the S&P 500 Total Return Index for example, define rare events relative to the prevailing trend and volatility.  The chart below displays a number of these periods in which the selling intensity was robust enough to get the S&P below the lower band.  These periods invariably have news events behind them.  Notice this method separates the more intense movements, the shocks, versus the more common periods of trending and volatility.  Chartists tend to not get overly concerned with the details of the story behind the news, rather, the market’s reaction.  Simply put, price movements outside of the bands can define a reaction to an Unforeseen Fundamental Occurrences.

BrexitCreated with TradeStation © TradeStation Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved

Another popular method is to gauge the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX). The VIX is often referred to as the “Fear Gauge” as it tends to spike during times of negative market shocks. – (See chart below) Even though only two charting methods have been shown, there are numerous ways to define shocks.

Brexit Vix
Created with TradeStation © TradeStation Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved

The primary reason to have a mechanical or disciplined method of defining these events is because in the moment, emotions from the UFO event tends to cloud judgement.  Being able to identify these periods as being out of the ordinary can bring an investor back to the reality of the next step.

“Failing to plan is planning to fail”  – Benjamin Franklin

That pithy saying is full of wisdom, especially for the chart-based investor.  Once again, how does an investor respond to “Brexit”, a terrorist event, a sharp decline in oil, China lowering growth expectations, or an expected sour economic release?  When UFO’s occur, don’t try and overanalyze the content of the news but simply stay focused on your trading plan.  Yes, that assumes a trading plan is in place.  It is similar to the advice from a doctor or a trainer, “if you want to lose weight, you need to exercise”.  Thanks Captain Obvious!  This advice may be easier said than done but the goal is to develop a resistance to the emotional knee-jerk reactions that can pull an investor away from a trading plan.  A whipsaw may be the result, selling then rebuying soon after, but risk controls must be a priority.

Even if a trading plan is not an unemotional black box, rules based method, a logical, qualitative strategic approach can be applied. For example, setting investment exposure at levels in which the market response in either direction would be acceptable.  That way, an investor should not find themselves too far behind benchmarks if a reduction in exposure after a UFO is followed by a surprise rebound.  At the same time, if the market continues lower, at least some steps would have already been taken to reduce risk.

Articles related to the “Brexit’s” potential impact to the world’s economy are a dime a dozen right now. Such articles may add color to one’s understanding of the event but the most useful advice may be to simply prioritize the disciplines adherence to an established trading plan.

Disclosures

S&P 500 TR Index: is a capitalization weighted index of 500 stocks representing all major domestic industry groups and assumes the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains. It is not possible to directly invest in any index.

This writing is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell, a solicitation to buy, or a recommendation regarding any securities transaction, or as an offer to provide advisory or other services by Spectrum Financial, Inc. in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation, purchase or sale would be unlawful under the securities laws of such jurisdiction. The information contained in this writing should not be construed as financial or investment advice on any subject matter. Spectrum Financial, Inc. expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken based on any or all of the information on this writing.  For full disclosure please see disclosures page here.

Spectrum Financial, Inc 2023