Tag: Federal Reserve

A Lesson in Bonds

On June 14, 2016

Media outlets routinely convey public opinion through articles, blogs, interviews, etc. In many instances, the media helps to perpetuate public opinion even if the facts are skewed. Over the last year or more, there has been an onslaught of articles and interviews implying how an environment of rising interest rates should be bearish for the bond market.

Comments today will focus on the inaccurate implication of the term, “bond market”. The italic focus is at the heart of the matter, implying that the bond market is a singular entity.

The stock market is also portrayed as a singular entity but there tends to be greater public awareness of differentiating characteristics such as growth stocks versus value stocks, speculative versus defensive as well as various stock exchanges. Bonds also have various classes or groups, each with characteristics that may have some similarities with others but many characteristics that are in stark opposition to each other. Understanding the basics of such characteristics is behind the investment concept of bond rotation.

Price Movements

We will first just touch on a few characteristics and then zoom in on one with a very practical aspect in regards to rotation. The perspective of our assessment will be in regards to the characteristics of their underlying price movements. Many investors like to focus on credit rating and maturity. These two factors act independently from each other in their influence on price action which is an important concept when brought together. Credit ratings are opinions by specific agencies regarding the likelihood of repayment of the debt by the underlying company. The logical conclusion is the higher the rating, the lower the risk of default. This attractive quality plays a role in dampening price volatility. A bond’s maturity outlines the length of the debt obligation which may be 90 days, 5 years, 10 years, 30 years or some other time frame. In most cases, the investor is not obligated to hold the bond until maturity but can sell the bond to another investor in the secondary market. This concept is similar to the idea of a homeowner having a 30-year mortgage but is free to sell their house prior to the completion of the 30-year mortgage agreement. The future is unknown but the idea is the longer the maturity, the more potential for events that affect risk. That means a higher price volatility character as maturity increases. Now let’s combine these two independent factors in order to get a primary influence to a bond’s price action character. A highly rated investment with a very short maturity should have its dominant characteristic as being “low volatility”. At the opposite end of the spectrum, a low rated bond with a long maturity will have its dominant price characteristic as being highly volatile. Therefore, a short-maturity but low-rated bond may trade with some similar volatility measures as a higher rated bond but with a longer maturity.

Bonds are traditionally divided into classes or groups and then sub-groups. Each of these may have some dominant or defining characteristic but even then, the rating and maturity combination will generally define price action statistics. Common categories look like the following (from Morningstar):

Taxable Bond Municipal Bond:

Government                                                                 Muni National
Inflation Protected Bond                                          High-Yield Muni
Nontraditional Bond                                                  Muni Single State
Bank Loan
Preferred Bond
High-Yield Bond
Multi-sector Bond
World Bond
Emerging Markets Bond

Now that that the volatility characteristic has been covered, let’s focus on price direction. In order to establish a baseline for assessing direction, the S&P 500 Total Return Index will be used. The oversimplified way we will measure this is if the bond group moves generally in the same direction of the S&P 500 or not. While not all groups are displayed in the charts below, it is clear that each group represented has its own price action personality. Government Treasury Bonds as represented by the US 30-year Treasury Bond Futures have a tendency to move counter the stock market as represented by the S&P 500 TR Index. Quality rated bonds as represented by the Barclay’s U.S. Aggregated Bond Index also have a tendency to move counter the stock market.

The word “tendency” is used because there are plenty of exceptions to this rule of thumb. During times of stress in the economy and other times that evoke heightened levels of fear, investors often move into higher rated corporate and government bonds due to the perception their money is at less risk of default loss. The counter-equity direction has been muted over the last several months primarily due to reasons relatively new to the investment landscape.

The concept of fearful investors, concerned about deteriorating economic conditions, is still most likely responsible for propping up the quality-rated bond groups.

A rising stock market would indicate investors are not fearful but optimistic toward the economy. The twist is that the fear from a lack of economic optimism is coming from overseas. Negative interest rate policies and fears of a global economic slowdown have been driving foreign investors looking for the relative safety or perception of safety, to the US quality bond groups. This “flight to safety” is also being called a “risk-off” theme.

Risk Off – Risk On

If there is a “risk-off” theme, then there must be a “risk-on” theme. It is important to realize risk is not specifically defined but is a relative measure. Companies and various debt entities more reliant on economic expansion have less likelihood of interest payment default during those growth periods. Therefore, investors have a tendency to be eager to own those classes during economic expansions. High yield and floating rate/bank loan groups are represented in the charts above and below with the Barclays US High Yield VL Index and S&P LSTA US Leveraged Loan Index, respectively.

In 2008, the banking crisis caused a tremendous amount of fear among investors. Government and other quality rated bonds were not fully immune to selling pressure but those classes and their groups ultimately moved counter the stock market, generally speaking. They also moved counter the high yield and bank loan bond groups. During the stock market recovery in 2009, the flight to the relative safety of government bonds was mostly reversed as the high yield and bank loan bond groups recovered sharply. Quality bonds, as represented by the Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index mostly lost its counter stock market tendency but maintained its lower volatility character.

Headlines in print, television, and other media outlets appear to be trying their hardest to convince the public that a Fed induced, rising rate environment will harm “the bond market”.

Informed investors should be able to recognize that the bond market is multi-faceted.

Some groups may indeed struggle but others should be able to thrive. Investors looking to bonds as a component to their portfolios should recognize navigating within fixed income, or “bond rotation”, is a viable alternative to exiting the bond market altogether.

Disclosures

S&P 500 TR Index: is a capitalization weighted index of 500 stocks representing all major domestic industry groups and assumes the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains. It is not possible to directly invest in any index.

Barclays US High Yield Very Liquid Index: This benchmark includes publicly issued U.S. dollar denominated non-investment grade, fixed-rate taxable corporate bonds that have a remaining maturity of at least one year, regardless of optionality. The bonds are rated high yield (Ba1/BB+/BB+ or below) using the middle rating of Moody’s, S&P, and Fitch, respectively (before July 1, 2005, the lower of Moody’s and S&P was used). Included issues consist of only the three largest bonds from each issuer that has a minimum amount outstanding of $500 million or more (face value) and less than five years from issue date.

S&P/LSTA U.S. Leveraged Loan 100 Index: This benchmark is designed to reflect the performance of the largest facilities in the U.S. dollar leveraged loan market. Term loans from syndicated credits must meet the following criteria at issuance to be eligible for inclusion. 1) senior secured 2) minimum initial term of one year 3) minimum initial spread of LIBOR +125 basis points 4) U.S. dollar denominated 5) all constituents must have a publicly assigned CUSIP

Barclays U.S. AGG: Bond Index: The Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index measures performance of the total U.S. investment grade bond market. It is a market value-weighted index that tracks the daily price, coupon, pay-downs, and total return performance of fixed-rate, publicly placed, dollar-denominated, and non-convertible investment grade debt issues with at least $250 million par amount outstanding and with at least one year to final maturity.

This writing is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell, a solicitation to buy, or a recommendation regarding any securities transaction, or as an offer to provide advisory or other services by Spectrum Financial, Inc. in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation, purchase or sale would be unlawful under the securities laws of such jurisdiction. The information contained in this writing should not be construed as financial or investment advice on any subject matter. Spectrum Financial, Inc. expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken based on any or all of the information on this writing. For full disclosure please see disclosures page here.

Negative Interest Rates & Shrinking Balance Sheets

By Christopher P. Hendrix, CMT

On February 26, 2016

In Market Research

A little more than a year ago, the European Central Bank adopted a negative interest-rate strategy. The Bank of Japan recently followed suit. What is this strategy supposed to achieve, and how is it impacting financial markets? Let’s start by examining what these central banks hope the negative interest-rate strategy achieves. The European Central Bank and the Bank of Japan are now charging their member banks on overnight cash reserves. The idea is to forcibly encourage member banks to loan money to potential customers that may in turn, stimulate the economy through spending, not saving. From the member bank’s perspective, an outcome like that could entail higher than acceptable credit risk on the bank’s loans. Member banks could also pass along the negative interest-rate to depositors which could lead to an exodus of their customers. The decision some banks have chosen is to not charge these negative interest rates to customers which then reduces the member bank’s balance sheets, putting pressure on their profit margins. The weakening of bank balance sheets is being labeled as one of the contributing factors to the stressed financial markets, especially foreign markets (see chart below).

Click to Enlarge

Other choices banks and investors have is to buy government bonds (foreign and US). Investors are taking their foreign assets and depositing them in “safer” US securities, playing a major role in boosting the US Dollar. The US has yet to adopt a negative interest-rate policy but Janet Yellen, the US Federal Reserve chair, has recently gone on record as saying that type of policy is “on the table”. This relatively new financial engineering has rippled through the global financial system and its long-term impact has yet to be seen.

Spectrum’s Portfolio Management Impact:

The news itself of negative rates does not specifically cause positions to be altered in the Spectrum’s funds or strategies. The influences, however, to the various asset classes, stocks, bonds, currencies, etc., can be assessed through the price action in those markets. This could be in the form of new trends, up or down, or through jagged price action. More specifically, positive influences can be seen in quality-rated bonds, corporate and government. Upward influences in the US Dollar have played a role in volatility and negative trends seen in global equity markets, primarily the emerging markets. Adjustments within our funds or strategies generally reflect these prevailing trends.