Month: May 2016 Page 1 of 2

Myths are stories that often have some element of truth in origin, but over time, take on untrue characteristics. Wall Street is no exception as investors often hold tight to methods that appear to be helpful short-cuts to wealth but often fail when viewed from other angles. At the beginning of the year, investors talked up the “January Barometer” as this year’s selloff in January supposedly would forecast a bad 2016. The Super Bowl winner, coming from the AFC or NFC, can predict performance. Another story this time of year is, “sell in May and go away”. The moving average Death Cross and the Hindenburg Omen are other popular yet dubious Wall Street myths. Investor sentiment is a broad category that spawns numerous myths. At the core of many of these is the belief that bullishness is tied at the hip with low volatility and when together, they display a high degree of optimism, then leading the market to collapse.

Myth: Bullishness tied with extended low volatility leads to market collapse

Sentiment can be measured in many ways. This discussion will cover only a few sentiment measures for the stock and bond market. Major categories citing investor sentiment include surveys, volatility, and spreads.

Market Vane is an organization that surveys investors, tracking if the respondents are bullish or bearish toward specific stock market indexes and other investment choices. Readings at 50 convey a 50% response of bullishness and thus a neutral reading. Levels above 70% bullishness have not been seen since 2007, so above 60% is a modern interpretation of extreme bullishness. Notice how the Market Vane readings above 60 appeared to have stopped the S&P 500 Total Return Index in its tracks back in November and December 2015 and again as recently as April of this year. The evidence presented in this chart supports the idea that extremes in bullishness mark highs in the stock market.

Now let’s go back to late 2014 and the summer of 2015. Points 1 and 2, respectively, display sharp market corrections. Did the correction occur following extreme bullish readings from the Market Vane S&P 500 Index survey? Absolutely! As mentioned earlier, myths are often founded in some element of fact and that was the case for these two examples. However, like the boy who cried wolf, extreme investor bullishness was visible for many months prior to the corrections as the S&P 500 worked higher. This is just one example but the claim of extreme bullishness warning of an impending market correction may have a nugget of truth, but care needs to be given when embracing the message as immediately useful. If the Market Vane reading reaches over 60 in the future, odds favor that we will once again hear the myth of a market correction being at our doorstep.

Another popular measure of investor sentiment is the CBOE Volatility Index, commonly referred to as the “VIX” – most data vendors have the letters V-I-X within their version of the symbol. Generally speaking, the VIX conveys the implied volatility component embedded with S&P 500 Index options. While the VIX is by far the most popular, this measure exists for numerous indexes and investment choices. Investors eager to buy options during periods of increased volatility tend to pay inflated option premiums relative to periods of lower volatility. Think of it like how someone seeking hurricane insurance as a storm approaches would likely pay higher insurance premiums than if no storm was predicted. Therefore, the VIX tends to decline as investors become more bullish and rise as investors become more fearful. This explains why the VIX is also called the “Fear Index or Indicator”.

The myth is that a low VIX precedes market corrections.

Remember, the word “myth” is not being defined as outright false but has a measure of false or exaggerated claims. The chart above supports the myth in multiple periods. The lower portion of the chart displays a horizontal line at the 15 level, what many would claim as a low number historically – at least according to myth. Sub-15 readings preceded the S&P 500 TR Index corrections in August, 2015, January 2016, and the loss of momentum in April to present May.

Now let’s go back to 2013 through 2014. The VIX not only reached below 15 but stayed under that line for months at a time while the S&P 500 TR Index continued higher. Not shown, but this was also the case during the bull market environment from 2005 through the first half of 2007.

Next stop is a sentiment gauge within the bond market, specifically the high yield market. The yield spread measures yields from treasuries, usually the 10-year T-Bond, versus high yield bonds. Spreads widen when investor fears heighten, sometimes for valid, longer-term reasons and sometimes for short-lived, emotional ones. Ideally, a favorable environment has declining trends in yield spreads which is the case currently. With this example, we will avoid directly noting a widespread myth but some common concerns are to be addressed. In the first half of 2015, yield spreads were falling as the high yield index rose to test the previous highs from mid/late 2014. The fast rise and perceived resistance would have been reasonable concerns brought up by investors. Those concerns alone, however, would have provided a flimsy argument despite the accuracy evident by the failure of the trend. So far in 2016, the high yield index has accelerated sharply and is now near potential resistance of the previous highs – a very similar situation to early 2015. Using this level of the yield spread as a gauge of investor bullishness, its current level is not sending the message of over-exuberance.

If we turn our attention to a longer-term chart, the current yield spread in the mid-5’s is not only far from the lowest levels, but lower levels can be maintained for long periods of time while uptrends in the high yield market persist.

Clues brought to our attention by various sources should not be totally disregarded, but myths tend to persist because many are taken at face value as being true.

In the three examples presented, arguments can be made that warrant attention in the current market environment, based on successful but narrowly focused historical examples. Savvy investors develop habits of investigation and research that often bust long-held Wall Street myths.

Disclosures

S&P 500 TR Index: is a capitalization weighted index of 500 stocks representing all major domestic industry groups and assumes the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains. It is not possible to directly invest in any index.

Barclays US High Yield Very Liquid Index: This benchmark includes publicly issued U.S. dollar denominated non-investment grade, fixed-rate taxable corporate bonds that have a remaining maturity of at least one year, regardless of optionality. The bonds are rated high yield (Ba1/BB+/BB+ or below) using the middle rating of Moody’s, S&P, and Fitch, respectively (before July 1, 2005, the lower of Moody’s and S&P was used). Included issues consist of only the three largest bonds from each issuer that has a minimum amount outstanding of $500 million or more (face value) and less than five years from issue date.

This writing is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell, a solicitation to buy, or a recommendation regarding any securities transaction, or as an offer to provide advisory or other services by Spectrum Financial, Inc. in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation, purchase or sale would be unlawful under the securities laws of such jurisdiction. The information contained in this writing should not be construed as financial or investment advice on any subject matter. Spectrum Financial, Inc. expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken based on any or all of the information on this writing. For full disclosure please see disclosures page here.

What Did the Fed Say?

By The Spectrum Team

On May 6, 2016

In Market Research

On Wednesday 4/27/16, the Federal Reserve decided to leave rates unchanged. Pretty uneventful, huh? “Fed watching” is a popular term used by investors to assess the Fed’s actions, or inactions, and how the Fed summarizes vast amount of number crunching as it relates to trends in the economic landscape. Observational analysis can also be taken a step further by assessing the reactions in the stock and bond markets.

What the Fed Said

First let’s take a look at what they said and then we can attempt to read between the lines. They acknowledged economic activity slowed its pace of growth in pretty much all areas other than the housing market.

Their rebuttal against alarm was based on the consistently improving jobs market and the future spending power that should bring.

Speaking of spending power, consumer spending increased at a 1.9% rate which not only was lower than the 2.4% increase in Q4, 2015, but was the slowest since the first quarter of 2015. An argument can be made that because it accompanied a higher savings rate and lower consumer debt numbers, the dip could be akin to a “pause that refreshes” ahead of another expansion of spending. Decreased spending, if accompanied by weaker employment and higher debt levels, could establish a trend toward consumer defensiveness but again, that was not the case.

The Federal Reserve also noted their concerns of threats to the global economy have diminished.

Ultimately, the lack of rate change sent the message of a domestic and global economy that is not too hot and not too cold. Both extremes could have led to market shocks in various ways.

A Calm Reaction from Markets

The stock and bond markets often have sharp reactions to the Fed comments but the stock and bond markets were relatively calm. Treasury yields did fall (prices rose) after the announcement on Wednesday but probably not for reasons of investors fearing recession. From the perspective of US investors, treasury bonds tend to be less attractive than growth assets during periods of overall economic improvement. Put another way, the perception of ongoing economic weakness would generally have treasury prices rising (yields falling), accompanied by weakness in the stock market.

But treasuries prices did rise on Wednesday – what gives!?!

Investing globally has become easier and easier. That means analysis must take into account the ripple effects across asset classes and across geographic borders. The chart below shows that while the 10-year yields in the US are low, and perhaps not very attractive to US investors, yields are much more attractive when viewed from the perspective of foreign investors.

source1

Simply put, the reaction to the Fed and the general resilience of treasury bonds in recent months may have more to do with favorable relative yield globally as compared to being the destination of those fearing a trend toward a weaker US economy.

As stated, fear of a weakening US economy would generally be evident in weakness within the stock market and bond categories traditionally sensitive to growth. The charts below display upward sloping shorter-term trends in the stock market, high yield market and bank loan market. The CBOE/S&P Volatility Index (VIX) is often called the “Fear Index”. It trended lower in the period. All four of these measures convey bullish investor sentiment, not concerns of a slowing economy.

General consensus had the Fed raising rates approximately four times in 2016 which played a role in the rocky start of the year in equities and flight to quality bonds.

Those price trends have since been reversed as the recent consensus points toward approximately two rate increases this year.

So if the environment is implied to be at a slower pace of interest rate increases, what would that mean for the markets? We don’t want to over assume the future but we can use history as a general guide.

The chart above shows that historically, rising rate cycles have caused increased volatility versus the period prior to the tightening cycles. However, the speed of increases had the stock market taking on different trend characteristics. The slower tightening cycle had a more desirable outcome for equity investors versus the jagged sideways path during periods of faster tightening cycles.

Actions or inactions by the Fed combined with assessing market reactions can give deeper insight into the true health of the economy and possible paths of the stock and bond markets.

Disclosures

Standard and Poor’s 500 TR Index (S&P500) is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks representing all major industries.

The CBOE Volatility Index^® (VIX^®) is a key measure of market expectations of near-term volatility conveyed by S&P 500 stock index option prices.

10-Year Real Yields Real yields on Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) at “constant maturity” are interpolated by the U.S. Treasury from Treasury’s daily real yield curve. These real market yields are calculated from composites of secondary market quotations obtained by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The real yield values are read from the real yield curve at fixed maturities, currently 5, 7, 10, 20, and 30 years.

Month: May 2016 Page 1 of 2

Wall Street Myth vs. Market Reality

What Did the Fed Say?

What the Fed Said

A Calm Reaction from Markets

Disclosures